7 California Mayors Lend Support to Transportation
June 15, 2016
7 California Mayors Write in Support of SBX1-1 (Beall) and AB 1591 (Frazier) – view letter!
Gov. Jerry Brown and lawmakers strike California budget deal that adds money for housing and child care
June 10, 2016
Gov. Jerry Brown and legislative leaders reached an agreement on a new budget to fund state government, a proposal highlighted by $400 million in low-income housing subsidies as well as expanded funding for child care and early learning programs. Read more…
State transportation funding deal looks less likely as politics drain the will of legislators
June 6, 2016
Read article from CalAPA Insider – latest news!
Call to Action – Roadmap to Consensus
May 20, 2016
Call to Action! Roadmap to Consensus: Click to access!
May 12, 2016
LAO Assessment of Governor’s 2016-17 Budget: Transportation Proposals
February 23, 2016
The Governor’s budget provides a total of $17 billion from various fund sources for all departments and programs under the California State Transportation Agency in 2016-17. In the following report, the LAO assesses the Governor’s budget proposals in the transportation area: The 2016-17 Budget: Transportation Proposals
Highway and Road Maintenance and Repair Needs. In order to assist the Legislature in its deliberations regarding increased funding for state highway and road repairs, we assess the costs to maintain and rehabilitate core aspects of the state highway system—pavement, bridges, and culverts—as well as local roads. We find that the state has ongoing highway repair needs of about $3.6 billion annually as well as an existing backlog of needed repairs totaling roughly $12 billion. This need is significantly higher than can be addressed through the existing funding of about $1.6 billion for these purposes. We recommend a roadmap to assist the Legislature in ensuring that the highest priority needs are addressed first and that any additional funding provided is aligned with those needs. Specifically, we recommend the Legislature (1) make the Highway Maintenance Program the highest priority for additional funding to address $1.1 billion in ongoing unmet needs as well as a $3 billion existing maintenance backlog, (2) make the State Highway Operation and Protection Program the next priority for additional funds, (3) determine the level of funding for local roads based on legislative priorities weighed against state highway needs, (4) align permanent funding sources with ongoing needs and temporary funding sources with one-time needs (such as addressing backlogs), and (5) adopt accountability measures to ensure that any additional funds are spent effectively.
NBC Nightly News Video: Urban Roads Take Toll on Drivers’ Bottom Line
December 29, 2015
Bay Area Growth Impacting Aging Transportation System
November 30, 2015
Bay Area’s growing economy and population are taking a toll on the region’s aging transportation…. Read more…
New Report: Will Americans Support Higher Gas Taxes? Yes–Under Certain Conditions…
November 30, 2015
Common wisdom holds that Americans do not support increased taxes at the gas pump. However, a just-released Mineta Transportation Institute research report says the majority of Americans will support those taxes, but only if the revenue… Read more!
…revenue is invested in specific transportation improvements that people value. The results of a national telephone survey are detailed in What Do Americans Think About Federal Tax Options to Support Public Transit, Highways, and Local Streets and Roads? Results from Year Six of a National Survey. The survey findings have implications for current Congressional discussions about funding the transportation infrastructure.
The survey, the sixth in an annual series, was directed by Asha Weinstein Agrawal, PhD, and Hilary Nixon, PhD. The report is available for free download athttp://transweb.sjsu.edu/project/1428.html
Two proposed federal bills would raise gas tax rates. One bill, H.R. 1846, would index the gas tax to inflation and create a bi-partisan, bi-cameral transportation commission that would provide long-term funding of the Highway Trust Fund (HTF). That bill is currently in the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. Another proposed bill, H.R. 680, would increase the gas tax by five cents per year for three years. That bill is with the House Committee on Ways and Means.
But if either bill is to gain support, legislators must be confident that increases in transportation taxes and fees would be politically feasible.
This report provides valuable data.
“These survey results show that a majority of Americans would support higher taxes for transportation, but only under certain conditions,” said Dr. Agrawal. “For example, a gas tax increase of 10 cents per gallon to improve road maintenance was supported by 71% of respondents, whereas support levels dropped to just 31% if the revenues were to be used more generally to maintain and improve the transportation system.”
Specific taxes tested were ten variations on raising the federal gas tax rate or creating a new mileage tax, as well as one option for creating a new federal sales tax. In addition, the survey collected standard sociodemographic data, some travel behavior data, and respondents’ views on the quality of their local transportation system and their priorities for government spending on transportation in their state.
“U.S. policymakers face a dilemma,” said Dr. Nixon. “Transportation revenues available from state and federal gas taxes have fallen significantly, especially in terms of inflation-adjusted dollars per mile traveled. At the same time, the transportation infrastructure requires critical and expensive system upgrades.”
That dilemma offers only two possible resolutions. Either the nation must dramatically lower its goals for system preservation and enhancement, or new revenues must be raised. If the latter is to happen, legislators must craft the means to pass those bills in a form that Americans will support. These survey results can help to shed light on current public opinion.
MTI has conducted several similar surveys.
The random-digit-dial telephone survey tested national support for federal gas, mileage, and sales tax options to raise revenue for transportation purposes. Multiple variations on the mileage-tax and gas-tax concepts were presented to test relative support levels among the options.
The Mineta Transportation Institute has conducted similar surveys annually since 2010. Looking across the six years of survey data, support for all the taxes has risen modestly since 2010. From 2014 to 2015, support increased for nine tax options.
A total of 1,503 adults completed the 2015 survey in either English or Spanish between February 26, 2015, and March 31, 2015. For the full sample, which included both land-line and cell-phone numbers, the margin of error was ± 2.53 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
The full research report provides in-depth analysis of the survey results, reviewing trends in support across the six annual surveys, and investigating how the revealed opinions may vary according to respondents’ socio-demographic, political, and travel-behavior characteristics. Go tohttp://transweb.sjsu.edu/project/1428.html
Tweet this: MTI just released the full research report – What are American views on increased transpo taxes and fees? http://ow.ly/ONkLX
ABOUT THE RESEARCH TEAM
Asha Agrawal, PhD, is director of the MTI National Transportation Finance Center and also an associate professor of urban and regional planning at San José State University. Her research and teaching interests in transportation policy and planning include transportation finance, pedestrian and bicycle planning, and planning and transportation history. She has a BA from Harvard University in folklore and mythology, an MSc from the London School of Economics and Political Science in urban and regional planning, and a PhD from the University of California, Berkeley in city and regional planning.
Hilary Nixon, PhD, is an associate professor and chair of urban and regional planning at San José State University. Her research and teaching interests are in environmental planning and policy focusing on the relationship between environmental attitudes and behavior, particularly with respect to waste management and linkages between transportation and the environment. She holds a BA from the University of Rochester in environmental management and a PhD in planning, policy, and design from the University of California, Irvine.
ABOUT THE MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE
The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) conducts research, education, and information transfer programs regarding surface transportation policy and management issues, especially related to transit. Congress established MTI in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act. MTI won national re-designation competitions in 2002, 2006 and 2012. The Institute is funded through the US Department of Transportation, the US Department of Homeland Security, the California Department of Transportation, and public and private grants. The internationally respected members of the MTI Board of Trustees represent all major surface transportation modes. MTI, the lead institute for the nine-university Mineta National Transit Research Consortium, is affiliated with San Jose (CA) State University’s College of Business. Visit transweb.sjsu.edu
Contact: Donna Maurillo, MTI Communications Director
831-234-4009 (24 hours) donna.maurillo (at) sjsu.edu
Research Brief (221K)
Asphalt Shows Off ‘Speed of Construction’ Advantage in I-10 Emergency Reconstruction
November 30, 2015
CalAPA. Asphalt’s speed-of-construction attributes garnered worldwide attention last week when a major Southern California freeway was reopened in just five days after experiencing major flood damage.
Interstate 10, a major freeway connecting Los Angeles to Phoenix was closed when flash-flooding caused a bridge to collapse, forcing eastbound traffic to take an hours-long detour. The interstate carries an average of 27,000 vehicles a day through the area.
Working around the clock, a contractor brought in by Caltrans, Granite Construction, trucked in 2,500 tons of asphalt and 2,000 tons of base course to pave a temporary detour around the damaged bridge and traffic was able to pass through the area at noon Friday to great fanfare.
The freak summer rainstorm inundated drought-stricken Southern California last weekend, sending torrents of chocolate-colored water sweeping across the parched desert landscape. A concrete structure that carries I-10 traffic over Tex Wash, about 44 miles east of Route 86 (Coachella) and 42 miles west of the Arizona state line, took the brunt of the flooding. According to Caltrans Public Information Officer Tyeisha Prunty, three other structures received minor damage and were repaired.
The temporary detour, which will carry traffic alongside the collapsed concrete structure at reduced speeds, will be in place until the structure can be replaced, she said. That process could take months, Prunty said, at an estimated cost of $5 million.